Table of Content
If I go with the KEF I would probably need to buy 4 to have the same atmos speakers in front and back. #1 don't believe Klipsch sensitivity numbers, they grossly exaggerate the sensitivity. The RP600m measure closer to 87dB-88dB and on average Klipsch speakers measure about 8-10dB less sensitive then they claim.
Though their products are a bit expensive they have never compromised with the quality. You can find bookshelf speakers, soundbars, or even subwoofers whatever audio component you want. Also, there is no compromise with the sound quality and this makes it a bit expensive than other brands.
Specifications, Efficiency, and Design
The names of these speakers are derived from Kent Engineering and Foundry, which occupied the same space. GP Acoustics, a subsidiary of the Gold Peak Group with headquarters in Hong Kong, currently owns KEF. I also get a discount on their stuff which is why I'm even considering it at the moment lol.
But one thing some may not like about KEF speakers is that they are a bit expensive than Klipsch or other brands. Some speakers are worth the high price, some of them don’t worth it. Klipsch Reference Premium series is widely known for its expansive sound stage.
KEF Q750
You'd be better off taking the savings of using bookshelf speakers for your front L/R and buying a second SVS sub ... In that room two PB1000 would be better than one PB2000. Personally I leaned towards KEF because I prefer incredible imaging/sound-stage over dynamics. A speaker capable of painting a 3d sound-stage with pinpoint imaging was a top priority for me which I found the klipsch were lacking. I also prefer the bass performance on the KEF towers (fast/ tighter /punchier) IF you're able to power them properly. I believe the RF 7 II is the only reference series to use a true compression driver.
I don't know the exact models but they would have been similarly priced to the KEF Q series. I haven't looked up the sound signatures on these brands but here's my $0.02. I favor Klipsch speakers myself, because I love the clarity and dynamics they have. And like was mentioned before, the new RP Series speakers are not the knife to the brain treble that some of the cheaper or older models could demonstrate at times. There was only a handful of songs available on the system so I played Hotel California at quite a high volume and again I thought it sounded great.
Soundboxlab
I may end up painting the Klipsch Atmos speakers cabinets so they don't look so "band aid" installed. My final cross over frequency is 120hz and above as well as receiving a 5db boost in the overall system. On tap is 300 watts rms which is available to the Klipsch. The sensitivity for the KEF is only 86db and if I remember right the Klipsch are rated around 99db.
The sweetspot essentially becomes the entire room and you'll get far wider dispersion and soundtage. Using the stereo amp with dac for the tv it obviously only gives you stereo not surround sound. It's just frustrating I can't get anywhere to sound test them and there's not too much out there on them neither. So I'm undecided between the KEF R300 and the Klipsch RP-600m speakers. I've heard that the Klipsch are better for Heavy Metal which is what I'll mostly be listening to and aren't really that fussy with which amp to use. There's no wya at all I can test these out however as they're not sold in any store near me in the UK.
KEF Speakers
The OP didn't state what his goals were, but from what it seemed, he was comparing two large, sensitive speakers. I don't think I will use a studio monitor for my living room. Will only use it for Studio or computer room and I will prefer to go with Adam audio should I wanted to go for studio monitors.
I've never listened to any KEF's before, but they have an equally outstanding reputation. Either brand you choose, I don't think you can go wrong. However, I think you'd be getting a outstanding deal on the KEF's and I'm sure your BIL could make sure you got to audition anything you wish. Maybe take along a favorite movie and music you're familiar with too. Im also currently getting new equipment for my home theater room which is actually our bedroom.
They remain at the forefront of the audio industry despite being quite different. A question that almost everyone asks when making this comparison is which of these two brands is going to be the better choice. Considering the sizes and sensitivity of these speakers, Is kef overpriced or it deserves the Price. This is probably one of the most desirable attributes for any speaker. Without wide dispersion you have a small 2d/directional sound-stage.
Indeed, Klipsch offers a wide selection of speakers to suit every need, including some of the best ceiling speakers available. When listening to a pair of Klipsch speakers, it is straightforward to identify them because they are well known for their distinctive copper woofers. Despite having a wide selection, they are probably best known today for their complete home setups. The 3-channel setup ensures a surround sound with left, right, and center satellites.
As for Surround mode or use does the KEF have an adjustable crossover? I want to add a pair of Dolby Atmos enabled speakers to my 5.1 home theater system. The R300s, at £700 for PT are something of a steal and have to be the very best speakers available at that price point. Lovely looking speakers as well especially with the magnetic grills off. Soundstage is brilliant and is reflected in the great instrument separation and the combo makes for good rock listening.
The sub is also important but I am quite confident that by getting an SVS 10” or 12” PB I will have a quality product. Vizio has gained popularity in recent years thanks to its high-quality, affordably priced soundbars with innovative features. It is very challenging to distinguish which soundbars in Vizio's catalog... I am the person behind thesoundstour.com, and my name is Elena.